bAIbelAV
/av/concordance09 / 11 · PROCESS

Ask your translation memories

Ask your memories, and see the segments that answer.

"How have I translated indemnity?" "Are my notice headings consistent in case?" Plain questions, answered from real searches of the memories this project reads, with where each answer came from.

"How have I translated this before?"

Ask it in those words. The variant audit pulls every rendering of a term across your read-TMs and groups them by what you actually wrote. The drift check groups by shape rather than wording — length, ending, capitalisation — which is how you find the three segments that were translated on a different day.

The AI model writes the query. A search engine runs it.

Term, reverse, proximity, wildcard, fuzzy, Boolean and a cheap count check — seven ways into your memories, and the agent chooses between them the way you would. What comes back is a real search result, not a summary of one.

THE AGENT CHOOSES A KIND OF SEARCH term reverse proximity wildcard fuzzy Boolean count AND WRITES THE QUERY “limitation liability”~3 the two words, within three of each other searchengineruns it BACK: THE SEARCH RESULT ITSELF The limitation of liability in clause 12 applies. Die Haftungsbeschränkung in Ziffer 12 gilt. 0.91 Contracts EN-DE Any limitation on the supplier’s liability … Jede Haftungsbeschränkung des Lieferanten … 0.84 Contracts EN-DE The limitation of the seller’s liability … Die Beschränkung der Haftung des Verkäufers … 0.77 Supply 2024 EACH PAIR WITH ITS SCORE AND THE MEMORY IT CAME FROM

It can search your memories. It cannot sweep them.

Fifty hits per call. A count check before any unfiltered query, refusing above two hundred. Those limits live in the retrieval tools themselves, not in the instructions given to the AI model, so they hold whatever the agent is asked.

THE AGENT ASKS term search source contains “indemnity”, all read-TMs THE TOOL COUNTS FIRST 1,340 matches across your memories OVER 200: NOTHING FETCHED Narrow it. Filters you can use: domain: Legal project: Supply 2024 ASKED AGAIN, NARROWER term search “indemnity”, domain: Legal 37 matches: under 200, fetched ALL 37 RETURNED: AT MOST 50 PER SEARCH THE LIMITS ARE IN THE TOOLS, NOT IN THE INSTRUCTIONS: THEY HOLD WHATEVER THE AGENT IS ASKED

Your read-TMs. The ones you chose.

The agent searches the memories the project already reads. Change that in project settings, as you always would: one list, the project's, and the agent searches exactly the memories on it.

Protected by the same confidentiality profile as your translation.

The stand-ins that protect your client's material in translation apply to every search the agent runs, from the same rules: your question, the segments it reads, the names of the memories and documents they came from, and the domain, project and client names it is offered to narrow a search by. Every request the agent sends is read back before it goes, the whole conversation each time, and refused if a protected name is still in it.

Runs on an AI model you choose for it.

Searching your memories this way needs an AI model that can work with tools over several turns. You choose it in the Agent Console, the same choice as for Agentic Editing: a wide one, across five providers, refreshed when the application starts. Add the provider's key in LLM Configuration and its models are there to choose.

A finding is not an edit.

When the search shows a term rendered three ways, name the one to keep. The agent finds the segments in this document that use the others and proposes the change in each, in the same queue and with the same per-segment review as any other edit; a locked segment is left as it is, and named.

Agentic Editing

“HOW HAVE I TRANSLATED INDEMNITY?” your read-TMs, grouped by what you wrote Freistellung ×14 Schadloshaltung ×3 Haftungsfreistellung ×1 YOU NAME THE ONE TO KEEP IN THIS DOCUMENT: STAGED AS PROPOSALS 12 … die Schadloshaltung Freistellung nach Ziffer 9 … ✓ ✗ 27 … ohne Haftungsfreistellung Freistellung durch den Käufer … ✓ ✗ 33 … den Umfang der Schadloshaltung Freistellung … ✓ ✗ 41locked: left as it is, and named in the reply EACH ONE YOURS TO ACCEPT OR REJECT, IN THE SAME QUEUE